Thursday, October 14, 2010

Analysis of Health Care Reform Bill

The medical mission trip that I took to the Dominican Republic last summer motivated me to become involved in health care. Access to any sort of health care there is extremely limited. There is almost no care outside of the country’s capital, Santo Domingo.
Although the health care conditions in a third world country like the Dominican Republic may seem abhorrent, the United States does not rank much higher than some third world countries in terms of equity of service to all citizens. The World Health Organization rated the national health care systems of 191 countries in terms of “fairness,” and the United States was ranked fifty-fourth.
Health care reform has become an important issue in America recently, and I wanted to find out more about the underlying factors and get both sides of the argument. I don’t understand why a country as rich and as medically advanced as ours is unable to provide everyone with access to health insurance. I figured that this blog project would be a great time to learn about something that I’m so interested in.
The American health care system is flawed in a number of ways. It is clear that reform is needed. The key issues are which parts of the system are flawed and what should be done to fix the flaws. The new health care bill that President Barack Obama signed in March will affect everyone. The new bill will be activated in portions, and the whole thing is expected to be implemented by 2014. This bill will affect everyone differently. Basically, everyone will have health insurance. Small businesses will be offered tax credits in order to give all employees health insurance. Insurance companies must reduce paperwork and justify their premium increases. Doctors will pay increased amounts for malpractice insurance and will have low government reimbursement rates.
Since the passage of the bill, Republicans have been working hard to get it repealed. They are concerned that it will impose an overwhelming tax burden on Americans for many years to come. They also are saying that it will increase the deficit and raise premium costs. The party is worried that it will impose higher prescription drug costs on seniors and the disabled.
The Democratic Party platform is based solely on making health insurance affordable and accessible to everyone. The party plans to offer tax credits to make quality, dependable coverage affordable. They plan on reducing premium costs by $1,000 by paying for the highest-cost medical cases. There will also be a Medicare prescription drug benefit to ensure that Medicare surpluses are used only for Medicare. This will make prescription drugs affordable for seniors. In the long run, the deficit will be reduced by $1 trillion by the government providing tax cuts and credits.
Some Republicans argue that health insurance is a luxury and not a right. They argue that we are slowly turning into a socialistic government. Yet, we are the only industrialized country in the world without some form of socialized health care. Republicans also argue that we have “the best health care system in the world,” but the World Health Organization ranked us 54th in fairness of our health care system out of 191 countries.
The Office of Personnel Management director, John Berry, recognizes that health insurance premiums for federal workers will be going up next year. The reason that this is happening is because new benefits are being offered. These benefits include preventive care costs being fully covered and young adults being able to stay on family plans until the age of 26. Government run health insurance premium rates are increasing, but they are increasing at a lower rate than those in the private-sector.
The new health care bill is going to affect everyone in different ways. Doctors and physicians “in general should benefit from this bill, and patients should benefit because they will be able to get preventive care and not rely on emergency rooms," said James Thrall, chair of the American College of Radiology's Board of Chancellors. Overall, the reform bill should benefit doctors because in 2008 it was shown that physicians spent almost $24 billion in charity care, much of which was for uninsured patients.
In the new plan everyone will have to get health insurance. Families earning less than $88,000 a year will be given government subsidies to help pay for health insurance. If they still truly cannot afford health insurance they will be granted a ‘hardship exemption.’ Families that earn at least $100,000 annually will buy health insurance or will pay a penalty if they don’t have it. The extremely wealthy, those earning $200,000 to $250,000 a year, will be taxed 30 percent higher in order to help pay for Medicare expansion. Those in support of the health care reform bill argue that requiring insurance is key to keeping costs down "because there are plenty of healthy uninsured people who will reduce premiums for sick uninsured Americans by being forced to be a part of the insurance pool,” as stated by Harvard Professor Amitabh Chandra. The 32 million Americans that are currently uninsured will be required to get health insurance.
America has the “best-in-the-world” doctors and hospitals but medical systems are out of reach for millions of Americans. In the education and training of doctors, nurses, technicians, and state-of-the-art medical research, America leads the world. T.R. Reid, a former Washington Post reporter, says that “The United States is good at providing medical care but not financing it.” He also states that, “All the developed countries I looked at provide health coverage for every resident, old or young, rich or poor. This is the underlying moral principle of the health care system in every rich country—every one, that is, except the United States.” The United States has the most expensive health care in the world, but we aren’t any healthier for it.
There is no reason that our advanced doctors and hospitals are not able to prevent death from diseases like breast cancer and colon cancer. This is why insurance companies will now be required to cover routine checkups and preventive care at no extra charge. Some of the preventive care services that will now be provided at no extra charge include: 1. Certain cancer screenings like breast, cervical, colorectal, etc. 2. Daily aspirin use to prevent heart disease 3. Immunizations for children and adults 4. Vision screening, and 5. Treatment of hypertension

6 comments:

  1. There is no doubt that America has one of the best health care systems in the world. Unfortunately, it is not available to all of its' citizens. The question that needs to be answered is if everyone should be able to have this high quality care regardless of their ability to pay. The upcoming midterm election will allow voters to express their opinion on the issue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Beachgirl5892
    On the basis of information and overall analysis of healthcare reform, I think you did a great job. You definitely presented both sides of the huge debate, while inserting your own view where appropriate. This added credibility to your opinion and gave the reader a relatively unbiased break down of healthcare reform. While I thought your introduction set the scene well, I did not feel that it really belonged in this post. I think it would have been better to stick to the facts and views of your issue, as that is much more analytical. But, overall great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, I thought your analysis post was very good. I agree with you on the fact that the health care system in this country needs to be reformed. Changes should be made so all citizens have equal access to health care. It really doesn’t make any sense that America leads in the world in producing doctors and other health care officials but a large percent of citizens can’t afford to see them. I also like the fact that you broke down Obama’s plan and you presented the thoughts and reasons of both political parties carefully. Due to the fact that majority of people don’t even fully know what his plan is about, I think your blog can help people understand more about his plans. For improvements, your blog was really good so it there isn’t much more you can do to improve. It wasn’t biased and it talks about the effects of the health care bill. To conclude, I also like the personal story that you gave at the beginning explaining why you were interested in the topic and why you want to go into health care. I think medicine needs more of people like you, people that actually care about helping others, than those making a paycheck.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your analysis showed great research, as you clearly had investigated the topic. I think your post could have been stronger if you had investigated a bit more into the various arguments for the differing political parties. You gave the overview but I'm sure there are much deeper schools of thought and issues. For instance, I know that some people compare the Bill to other countries current standards and argue they do not have good patient care. Tied in with this, you could have delved deeper into other discourse communities that are debating this, other than just the political aspect. On the other hand, you gave a clear view of the Bill. It is vital for your readers to understand the underlying aspects of the argument and you gave a good detailed description of the facts. This greatly resulted in comprehension for the many of us who did not fully understand the effects of the Bill. In a word of advice, I think it would be more effective if you discussed some bias surrounding the topic, so readers could understand better the discourse of your topic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Beachgirl, I agree with Shadow that the opening story sets the stage effectively for those who might not be initially interested in the health care issue. I thought your analysis of the political debate was very thorough, but agree with Ms. Ed that it might have been helpful to have included some discussion of the bias surrounding public discourse.

    I am concerned that you don't have any subsequent posts.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is my first time actually finding out facts about the issues concerning the health care reform bill and I am very interested in its outcome. In your post, you effectively presented both sides of the argument but I feel as if you could have further clarified the opinions concerning the bill through quotes from Congressman and even, President Obama himself. You strongly displayed the various facts of the bill and the discussed the effects it would have on health care, if implemented, so adding opinions would further strengthen your analysis, allowing your reader to understand exactly why certain groups do not approve of the bill. We have such a big nation with top of the line equipment and researchers, so it is a shame that 32 million people do not currently have access to it. All in all, you did a very good job on your post! The research added was very informational.

    ReplyDelete